Irvine's Remains Discovered

by JAKE NORTON

October 2024
"Is there some sort of April Fools' Day in October?" I asked myself at 6:00 AM. A friend from Australia had posted on my unDefined Community with the title A potential find of Irvine. It seemed so strange, so out of the blue, I couldn't parse it. So, I poured a cup of coffee and […]

"Is there some sort of April Fools' Day in October?" I asked myself at 6:00 AM.

A friend from Australia had posted on my unDefined Community with the title A potential find of Irvine. It seemed so strange, so out of the blue, I couldn't parse it. So, I poured a cup of coffee and clicked the link.

Wow. It was true...It is true. Partial remains of Andrew Comyn Irvine were discovered by Erich Roepke and Jimmy Chin on the Central Rongbuk Glacier.

Jimmy Chin with the remains of Andrew Comyn Irvine. Read the full story on National Geographic.

The information brought me back immediately, viscerally, to 25 years ago, turning over shirt collars at 27,000 feet, realizing what we had found, swirling in disbelief, wonder, stupor. I can only imagine Erich and Jimmy and their team are doing the same now, trying to digest and fully comprehend what they've found, what it means, what stories it can tell.

They've released but scant information thus far, which makes complete sense (but will undoubtedly be interpreted by some as mischievous, devious) as the artifacts need first to be analyzed and interpreted. I'm sure there's far more to the story, and it will be shared in due time.

For now, 100 years out from their disappearance, it is beyond exciting to have a new discovery - and a major one - and new light shed upon the story of Mallory and Irvine. I plan to take a bit of time to digest this and give some thought to what it all means, what it may (or may not) tell us, etc. But, for now, let's be happy first and foremost that the Irvine family may have some small degree of closure, and that the world may know a bit more about the story of Everest 1924.

The memorial plaque remembering George Mallory and Andrew Irvine, who lost their lives on June 8, 1924, high on Mount Everest. The original plaque was stolen years ago; this one was put in place by Mallory's grandson, George, in 1995.

14 comments on “Irvine's Remains Discovered”

  1. I thought the same thing as you did this morning, Jake, i.e. that it must’ve been a joke. Seeing Jimmy Chin's name associated with the story, put that thought to rest.

    What a truly amazing discovery and I cannot wait to learn more as facts come to light. Thanks, for all you contribute to the mountain community with your love for adventure, exploration, history, and the sharing the truth.

    1. Thank you, Josephine - glad I was not alone in thinking it was a joke at first! And, thank you for your kind words. I just posted some follow-up thoughts on the discovery here if you're interested.

    1. Thanks, Meg! Irvine's discovery is essentially below - WELL below - where we found Mallory, by about 6000 feet! No one I'm aware of has ever searched specifically in the Central Rongbuk, but this find is amazing!

  2. What are the odds Jimmy would be one of those to find the Sandy Irvine remains after Conrad (and you) were instrumental in finding Mallory. Some kind of karmic link; a magical symmetry. Can’t wait to hear the full story.

  3. Thank you Jake for sharing this. I can't wait until we can hear from you, perhaps the most authoritative source on all things Everest today, concerning this find when more information is available.

  4. Where do we go from here Jake? Brings little closure to families but raises more questions. It seems theory that Chinese threw him off the mountain is holding water now. To me I think bastards did indeed threw him off of the mountain without burial that historic person and his family deserves.It raises questions at least for me, why they didn't come out clean and just confirm that GLM and SI indeed did not summit. It raises question that will always hover over Chinise 1960 summit,what do they hidong?I don't believe they summited. But that's just me, my intuitive feeling.

    1. Thanks for the comment, Tony, and your respect for both Mallory and Irvine. I'm personally not sure that this find tells us that the Chinese did (or did not) find Irvine years back, or if they did (or did not) push his remains off. Maybe more info about that the team found will help shed light on this, but without word one way or other from the Chinese it will be hard I think. We shall see. Thanks again!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscriber Supported. Creator Appreciated.

Your patronage makes everything here possible. 
Thank you.

Subscribe now, cancel anytime. No spam, ever.

No thanks, but I would like the free newsletter!

Sign up for free

You might also enjoy…

Irvine's Remains Discovered

"Is there some sort of April Fools' Day in October?" I asked myself at 6:00 AM. A friend from Australia had posted on my unDefined Community with the title A potential find of Irvine. It seemed so strange, so out of the blue, I couldn't parse it. So, I poured a cup of coffee and […]

Read More

Learn more about

Jake Norton

More from Jake Norton:

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram
Send this to a friend